|
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
|
![]() i remember at one stage it was hard to convince people that every star was a sun. and ever sun had a solarsystem or planets inside.
many people used to think OUR sun was the only one. now what im in partial to believe that the earth doesnt move. but yet i need more evidence. perhaps i shall read that book & dvd. see what happens. well ill ask you now. to provide me with your best FACT that supports the claim that the earth doesnt move? im ears. cheers btw that other stuff i typed earlier was in relation to how david describes peoples reactions. but you would know that already wouldnt you?
__________________
"SO LET'S SING VOLUMES FOR THE SOULS THAT AREN'T FOR SALE INDEED LATELY THERES BEEN HELL HOUNDS ON MY TRAIL" Holsis Yolswa My resonant name at the point of death. Smart Enough? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |||||
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 11
|
![]() Quote:
defense/attack systems does not incorporate error correction for Coriolis force effects. Any person into this branch of IT business and access to that software should be able to confirm or deny this. Plain simple. Marshall Hall's quote on this : ![]() Quote:
called The Paris Gun aka Langer Max (long Max), a World War I German cannon officially called 38cm SKL/45. Marshall Hall adds the following discussion : " In addition to what was printed under the drawing (which was a lie) , the article had this to say about Big Bertha : Quote:
Quote:
far would Paris move in three minutes, Bo Bo? Well, it would be going about 680 MPH at that latitude, so that it would go just over eleven miles in a minute .... Call it 34 miles in three minutes. So, if the cannon was 76 miles due north of Paris, its railway-car-launching-pad would be located at over 1o latitude closer to the North Pole and would be (in the heliocentric myth) moving about 14 MPH slower than Paris. Thus, in three minutes Paris would move 34 miles to the East and the railway-car location and the shell fired from that point would miss by over a mile .... Iszat right? That's what the concept demands. And it's the same idea if the cannon was located due south .... But then if the cannon was due west or east of Paris the Coriolis effect would be canceled out?? Yes, Let's stress that point, Vern. From an encyclopedia we read: Quote:
north-south longitudinal basis and there would be no deflection on a east-west latitudinal basis? That's what the books say -- And the Germans "did not bother to correct for the Coriolis drift"?? Yeah. You know how the Germans are a little slow when it comes to guns and technical stuff ... Hah! Joke! Joke is right! All they needed to do to get around the Coriolis problem was to line old Bertha up due east of Paris and cut loose! But the simple fact of the matter is that they didn't pay any attention to that nonsense because they did know about guns and they knew that, in reality, it didn't matter what latitude the gun was on. There were a bunch of real factors that made a weapon that massive inaccurate and these were understood and accepted. But correcting for Coriolis drift because Paris was going to move part of 25 miles in three minutes from firing to impact was not one of the factors they bothered with. And, for the best of reasons, i.e., they knew it wasn't a factor! " Robert -- Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net Last edited by rmstock : 07-07-2007 at 03:28 AM. Reason: added Marshall Hall's discussion on Big Bertha |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |